Tag Archives: diy

I’m Not Unemployed. I’m NSFW.

I'm Not Unemployed. I'm NSFW.

One of the jokes I tell people after eight years working for myself as a webcartoonist is that I’m probably not able to work a normal job anymore. Eight hours a day with a break for lunch? The ability to blame other people for my mistakes? Does not compute! (and I do not commute)

That’s Richard Stevens on doing T-shirts to celebrate eight years of being self-employed. I’m getting one. Lord knows I need to maintain a sense of humor and pride about the whole self-publishing thing. It’s been the hardest, scariest thing I’ve ever done. And it’s also been the most rewarding, though that doesn’t always translate into dollars or sexy babes. Mostly it’s me meeting someone at a party and getting a weird look when I mention that I’m a writer. Or it’s me choosing “unemployed” whenever I fill out the occupation section of any given form. They all list every job in the world except for “writer.” Or flair bartender. Eff that. I’m not unemployed, I’m NSFW.

(FYI, if you want the T-shirt, you should know that Richard is doing this as a limited run that ends May 31, 2010.)

Suggested by The New Podler: A Self-Publishing Symposium

The New Podler is gathering opinions from a variety of authors regarding the current state of self-publishing. My hopelessly optimistic answers follow below. What are your thoughts?

* * *

How does self-publishing differ from traditional publishing?

Self-publishing is either liberation or self-indulgence depending on how you go about it. There’s a dubious association with instant gratification. The core benefits: you retain all control over your material, you keep a bigger chunk of the profits, and, oftentimes, you’re able to forge a more personal relationship with your audience. The drawbacks (which, depending on your motivation, can also be benefits): you must be your own publisher, editing, formatting, creating effective packaging; you must be your own marketing team—you must be willing and able to spend a portion of your time as a door-to-door salesperson of sorts. It’s a lesson in patience and refinement, though not such an added burden considering that many traditional publishers these days require you to have a marketing plan anyway.

Regarding availability, the gap is narrowing between books sold off of a book shelf and those sold via a web site. Chain book stores are steadily closing, and while you still have Barnes & Noble, Borders, and the independents, these stores only have so much physical space. There are legions of capable, entertaining “mid-list” authors whose books are not often included between Dan Brown and Stephenie Meyer. Selling through the Internet is a way to defeat the problem of limited shelf space. It also happens to be the most accessible method available to self-publishers.

Do self-published book review blogs help to raise the reader awareness of self-published books?

Absolutely. Legitimate, critical self-publishing review blogs (like good traditional-publishing review blogs) point out the blemishes as well as the dimples. For serious self-publishers, this is what you want if you have a good, solid book that doesn’t carry the reputation of being self-published because it can’t stand on its own, because it can’t find traditional publication. It should never be assumed that getting reviewed at a self-publishing review blog is easier than getting reviewed elsewhere.

How do you respond to the following statement: “Self-publishing is not a serious way to get one’s work into print now and never will be.”

I daresay a more accurate version of the above statement is: “Self-indulgence is not a serious way to get one’s work into print now and never will be.” If you’re not ready, if you’re rushed, then it will come across to reviewers and readers alike. With self-publishing, there’s no editor or agent acting as a stop-gap. What I’m finding as I go along is that it’s not so much the self-publishing model itself that needs to clean up its image as it is the ability of self-publishing authors to effectively promote their work. It’s all in how you do it.

Has the golden age of self-publishing already passed or is it yet to come?

Bigger and better things are yet to come. I’m convinced the traditional publishing industry had to stumble before a real awareness was raised regarding alternative book markets. The technology had to improve to a point where anyone with a computer and Internet connection could feasibly create and publish. Book stores, whether they’re selling print or digital copies, will continue to be country clubs for the elites, which is perfectly fine. Many authors are bestsellers for a reason: they’re very good at what they do. But they’re not the only kids on the block. Self-published books—good ones—will continue to fill the gaps. Eventually, when (and I do think it’s a matter of when and not if) e-books become the norm, everyone will be selling via digital download. The old notion that you find professional authors’ books on store shelves, and amateurs’ online will hold much less water.

What about the challenges posed to the self-published writer by having to promote and edit his or her own book?

This is something many traditional publishers are requiring of their authors due to tighter budgets. In the past, you could, to some extent, get away with merely sending in your manuscript and letting the publishing team handle the rest. You only needed to be on hand for signings or interviews. Now you need a marketing plan to go along with your synopsis and sample chapters. You need to convince your would-be publisher that you’re a hustler. You need an agent. And even then, a contract with a traditional publisher comes with no guarantees. Yes, depending on your contract, you’ll have access to physical store shelves, but you still have to work your butt off promoting yourself. You’re selling more books, but getting a smaller percentage of each sale. Not a bad thing. On the DIY side, you’re selling fewer books, but keeping more of the profits; you’re having to manage all your book sales yourself, whether through your web site or via consignment agreements with local book shop owners. All stereotypes aside, both traditional and self-publishing endeavors involve a lot of work. The latter is more easily attainable, whether as your sole method of publishing or as a hook to attract a mainstream publisher.

Why is it that a self-published author has yet to emerge into national recognition as a self-published author? (As opposed to being given a mainstream publishing contract after a self-published book attracts attention.)

I think a lot of it is the social stigma of someone coming up to you and saying, “My latest novel is great! You should read it!” People don’t like it when other people toot their own horn—but they don’t mind as much when you toot someone else’s horn. With self-publishing, this is something of a challenge. You have to promote yourself without sounding like a greasy car salesman, you have to get other people to blurb you and promote you. It can be exceedingly difficult, because you’re not working with a paid staff, you’re working with friends, other self-published authors, family members. They all have their own lives to worry about.

Also, at this point in time, traditional publishers still carry a lot of clout. A contract with Random House can do wonders for your literary presence. I’ve seen numerous instances where an author will start a series of books with a mainstream publisher, and then finish the series at a smaller press, or under his / her own imprint. Whatever politics are going on behind the scenes, an audience has gathered, and they’ll follow if the books are good. Bands do it all the time.

Has the experience of self-publishing changed the way you write? (If you have self-published.)

I started self-publishing because the small presses I’d been with closed up shop, and I felt my work up until that point was still relevant enough to warrant some kind of distribution. With new material I’ve found that I’ve become more daring. After all, I’m no longer having to adhere to a publisher’s tastes or guidelines. I’ve been able to stretch out a little, blending genres and styles. I’ve already had to go it alone, and so I’m not worried about falling from grace, so to speak. At the same time, though, I’ve had to make sure I don’t get too lax. Proofreaders are still important (before the publishing process!), honest opinions still matter, and it’s still my main goal each time around to write the best book I can.

* * *

There you go. As I mentioned at the start, I’m optimistic when it comes to the DIY movement. What’s happening now in the publishing world is sort of like what was happening fifteen years ago during the rise of the commercial Internet. And MP3s a short while after. I mean, who texted back then? Who ditched their CD collection in favor of MP3s? Nowadays, everyone texts (and sexts), everyone listens to MP3s—and, I wager, in a few more years, (nearly) everyone will be reading e-books instead of paperbacks. We just need that iTunes-like revolution. Maybe it’s the Kindle or the nook or some other fancied contraption that makes it as easy to squeeze 10,000 books onto a hand-held reader as it is to fit your entire music collection onto a handy portable player. Maybe it’s the mass production of such devices that lowers prices and suddenly makes not having one a social embarrassment (like with the iPod). Maybe it’s the passing of new environmental laws that restrict paper production. Whatever. The day will come. Are you looking forward to it, or do you already have your “Physical, not digital!” protest sign ready?

Books That Taste as Good as They Read

In lieu of shelling out nonexistent big bucks for billboard space, indie / DIY authors are turning to shopping bags, cookies, and cakes. The LL Book Review posted a blog on this over the weekend, and it syncs well with the whole “wear your domain name on your T-shirt” gimmick (which I had all my friends do back in the Gordey.net days).

A cute idea:

…they made a cookie for me which pictured the cover of my novel Misfit McCabe. Sondra mentioned to me that whenever they send their Wonderlicious book out for review or send out a press release, they send along a few cookies with the package to help sweeten the disposition of the recipients. It will definitely make your submission stand out from the crowd and give the recipient something to remember you by. One other idea that will help sales along, is to have a batch of photo cookies made to give away along with the purchase of a book for book signings.

Hey, give it a try and you may even charm one of those crusty old editors who adheres strictly to his 12-point-Courier-on-plain-white-bond submission guidelines. ;)

Authonomy.com Touts Slush 2.0

Authonomy.com

I mentioned in my last blog post that the slush pile, that common bane amongst authors near and far, has been gradually moving online. HarperCollins is the latest big time publisher to cash in on the “social editing” trend with Authonomy.com:

The publishing world is changing. One thing’s for sure: whether you’re a reader, writer, agent or publisher, this is an exciting time for books. In our corner of HarperCollins we’ve been given a chance to do something a little different.

The premise is simple: HarperCollins sells ad space, users edit, and a few highly-ranked authors get contracts. Not so different from other social editing sites, but certainly in step with current online business models. In any case, it’s one more place for authors to drop their trousers and waggle their goods in front of the masses. Waggling is good. :)

MagCloud Counts on Homebrewed Magazines

Several POD services offer magazine trim sizes (in addition to standard book sizes), but Hewlett-Packard hopes to create its own niche with their latest foray into the DIY world: MagCloud. I only know this because The New Podler posted a piece of commentary on a related The New York Times article. The part that stuck in my head:

We live in a moment in time when anyone can write whatever they want and get it out there. Yet so very few of these efforts are actually worth spending the time with. Most self-published efforts not only have nothing to say, they say whatever they want to convey badly.

Good point. POD volume has the potential to grossly outweigh traditional print volume, if it hasn’t already. Most of that will probably suck (as it does now). The simple truth: the self-publishing movement has transferred the slush pile from the editor’s office to the Internet. The reader (and not the editor) is now saddled with the task of sifting through the slush to find the gems. That’s not a flame or a subtle insult. It’s the difference between intriguing cover art, proper punctuation / margins / text justification—and a $20 perfect-bound rough draft set in Comic Sans. You can find the former, but only after wading through dozens of the latter. And at a premium. DIY books are more expensive than traditional print books, and way too many DIY authors are hesitant to offer quality previews of their work. In other words, you don’t know what you get until it arrives in the mail. As an author, I’m totally biased in favor of my own work, and the stigma surrounding the self-publishing world just kills me. However, as an ex-editor, I know that most stories and books are “meh,” and only a precious few are “wow!” As an editor, I’m shaking my head and going, “MagCloud. Great. One more outlet for the masses to spew out their thoughts almost as soon as they think them.”

Still, I want it to work. I want MagCloud to succeed so that I can jump onboard with my own little magazine down the line and get me some of that POD pie. We all want that, don’t we?

Dog Ear Publishing

Dog Ear Publishing

This morning I spotted an article in my feed reader from the POD People blog. This one’s on Dog Ear Publishing, yet another option for DIY publishers:

I took a look at their site and the Compare the Competition Page is quite nice and refreshing. The specs are pretty typical of the books produced in the trade category at any of the self publishing companies. Self publishing costs are derived from the web sites and companies listed. They admit to higher costs than say a Lulu but tout that their costs are on average $300 less than most subsidiary/self-publishing firms.

As Cheryl mentions, do your homework before waving your credit card in front of any POD / DIY publishing service—or before hastily deciding that self-publishing is the way to go in the first place. Regardless of your final choice, it’s good to know your way around some formatting / layout software, and to have the time and inclination to promote your book(s) afterward. Above all else, remember: Your spell-checker is your closest friend, but he’s prone to making silly little mistakes. You’re not looking over his shoulder because you think he’s a blundering dumb-ass, you’re looking over his shoulder because two heads are always better than one. This is the do-it-yourself arena, after all; any bonus skills you can tout will most definitely result in a better book. Put it to him that way and he’s sure to understand. ;)

Indie Writers vs. Indie Bands

Here’s an interesting article from The Hartford Courant:

In music, DIY is a source of credibility for acts that take pride in circumventing the music machine and the compromises often required to release an album through a record company, especially one of the major labels. With books, by contrast, do-it-yourselfers are usually regarded with skepticism, if not outright derision, when they pay to publish their own work through what is disdainfully referred to as a “vanity press.”

The Internet has helped to (slowly) change this. With many retail book stores vanishing from the streets, readers are turning online to find their books, and that makes it more likely they’ll stumble upon an indie author’s work. But there’s still risk. As was mentioned in the Courant article, there’s no track record with DIY authors, no guarantee that their books have been proofread or polished to any degree. Oftentimes it’s not obvious until you’ve received the thing in the mail.

Bands have an easier death. A new piece of music dies the night it is performed shittily. Audience members make a mental note: “This band sucks, don’t even buy a T-shirt from these schmucks—and certainly don’t buy their CD.” For writers it’s harder to clearly kick ass or outright suck. Writers don’t typically “perform” a work before it is published, and they certainly don’t go on tour unless they’ve got the financial clout and stage presence to do so. Again, the Internet is changing this. Blogs are to writers as nightclubs are to bands. Sort of. Well, with blogging the drinks aren’t usually as varied or well-mixed. ;)

I Can Do It Myself

Wil Wheaton offers up a few self-publishing resources over at his blog. My favorite bit:

I’ve seen a direct relationship between PDF sales and print sales, which is awesome and totally validates what I’ve always suspected to be true, but I was too afraid to try on my own.

I tend to oscillate between small press publishers and self-publishing, both of which involve a substantial amount of effort on my part as far as packaging and marketing goes. With the blogosphere’s rise to prominence, it looks like self-publishing is gaining more credibility. Oh, there’s still stuff out there that makes me cringe, but putting out your own book is no longer as vain an act as it was, say, 10 years ago. I was hesitant about the PDF thing at first, but discovered that my print sales actually increased when I started offering free PDF downloads from my site, or when I posted my novels as weekly serials.

So, do-it-yourselfers, take heart: You can go a long way with OpenOffice.org, Lulu.com, and a decent blog. ;)